He’s free to host video/livestream on his own site. He’s not banned from the internet, he’s kicked off specific distribution platforms. Huge difference, friendo.https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1026508128324599813 …
-
-
Sounds like a him problem.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which is actually the only point made in this thread that aligns with reality in any way. Who do we start forcing to have associations with which companies now? I demand Chomsky be given a show on Fox or free speech is broken!? free speech absolutists have gone bat-shit crazy.
End of conversation
-
-
-
then maybe just maybe he should follow the rules.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because his audience knows how to search for him on YouTube but not Google? Presumably, even if the video wasn’t on his site, they could still read, couldn’t they? ... Actually, that might be too high a bar for people who believe in lizard-men and sex slave ping pong parlors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Facebook, YouTube and Google are like common carriers now, like the phone companies. Shouldn't be able to kick people off because of corporate fiat.
-
Then break them up and sell off parts to allow more choices ... you can't force associations onto companies, and if you can I call first dibs on a new ABC News show.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
this is ridiculous, look, it's a business, they can dump him. Jesus, Chomsky is effectively banned from all MSM networks, why don't we really fight for free speech and force NBC/ABC/CNN/FOX to give Chomsky his own show (which I would love BTW.) what's the difference?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.