Maybe @ggreenwald can explain the distinction to you sometime. I’ve attempted on countless occasions and it never amounts to anything
-
-
And literally nobody - certainly not the people you're smearing as Trumpists - "suggest if anyone believes there’s merit to this investigation they worship mueller." They're just demanding the right to treat Mueller's *evidence-free* assertions in an indictment skeptically.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hi Michael. Think it's insufficient to hold Trump to account for whatever we may be able to find after years of digging, if we do not also hold Hillary Clinton and company to account for the obvious charges that have not been pursued. Our serious problems can no longer be hidden.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dunno, Mike that sounds awfully sensible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hold Trump to account for what exactly? There have been unfounded accusations but zero evidence. What!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We want SHRINES! Consider we just think / know Trump is an evil, heartless bastard and genuinely don’t like Putin. But think Putin is incidentally bad. It’s intellectually dishonest to suggest that w/ so MANY reasons to oppose Trump, Putin’s influence s/b off the menu.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.