Once upon a time, it was kind of seen as incumbent on reporters looking to do adversarial journalism to *question and interrogate* the premises being fed to them by establishment-cloistered officials. No longer
-
-
Show this thread
-
Articles like these are loaded with wild assumptions that two years ago would've been seen as completely insane, but now barely register. They're so embedded in the media's collective consciousness that nobody even thinks to challenge them anymorepic.twitter.com/cG7HbL7bRE
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think we’re capable of sowing division, discord, showing our system’s immorality, dysfunction, etc. all by ourselves thank you very much. In fact, it’s one domestic product the empire seems fine w/not outsourcing. IMO we cannot get to our “have you no shame” moment fast enough.pic.twitter.com/MKKPQx32tW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The happenstance about blaming Russia for "sowing discord" in the U.S. is that it can be used on just about anything media or political elites don't like or wish to limit debate. They can generalize the threat so much they don't need prove and people who disagree? There in on it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.