I don’t particularly care what people do in their private lives, journalist or not, but a pretty obvious sex-for-scoops arrangement is the type of thing Gawker would’ve skewered back in the dayhttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1011044604139974656 …
-
-
That aside, the sleazy romantic commingling of media and sources once-upon-a-time was widely ridiculed
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so what if the source is just stringing the reporter along for the sex? the end justifies the means philosophy seldom works.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.