I don’t particularly care what people do in their private lives, journalist or not, but a pretty obvious sex-for-scoops arrangement is the type of thing Gawker would’ve skewered back in the dayhttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1011044604139974656 …
-
-
Example: if you use sex/romance to elicit an admission from a government official that the military had covered up a massacre, clearly that’s justifiable. It’s entirely dependent on outcome
Show this thread -
That aside, the sleazy romantic commingling of media and sources once-upon-a-time was widely ridiculed
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.