Should also add: IMO, there’s nothing intrinsically morally wrong with using sex/romance to elicit information. It depends on the information you’re eliciting, and what you’re using it for
-
-
Show this thread
-
Example: if you use sex/romance to elicit an admission from a government official that the military had covered up a massacre, clearly that’s justifiable. It’s entirely dependent on outcome
Show this thread -
That aside, the sleazy romantic commingling of media and sources once-upon-a-time was widely ridiculed
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Say what you will, the fact reported here that she owned a dog with a Putin chew-toy, means this national security reporter had a bright future
@yashalevineThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not gonna lie, I read "sex-for-scoops" and assumed this was some ice cream shop sex club story I hadn't yet heard about. As always, I was disappointed by reality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reminds me of General Petraeus whose bright idea was to arm Al Qaeda https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/02/david-petraeus-bright-idea-give-terrorists-weapons-to-beat-isis … giving top secret information to his Mistress.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.