After 2016, there was supposed to be widespread acknowledgement that over-reliance on elite opinion-makers had made the media landscape cloistered, echo-chambery, skewed, and susceptible to big blindspots. But those same elites totally dictated coverage of the summit
-
-
Show this thread
-
Trump as a personage is so central to how liberals view the world now, they cannot see past their loathing (often justified). Removing him from the analytical equation just doesn't compute. Hence the obsession with whether he gets "credit." It's a recipe for more and more failure
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Today might have been the topper, as I read a piece that compared the Singapore summit to Munich.
-
Which piece is that?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Once again, Michael Tracey will end up being completely wrong when the entire situation falls apart just as those criticizing it are saying it will.....
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Dems/media can finally drop any pretense that they were ever 'anti-war'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sad thing is that the main TYT show is shockingly bad in this respect.
-
It's bad but only seems shockingly so if you ignore how bad it's been for the last 2 years.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Coverage has been poor and negative of the summit. Reveals MSM's lack of understanding of the stakes for our Asian allies. Reveals deepseated bias against NK. Such ignorance and sensationalism is inexcusable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd say their coverage of Clinton stealing the Dem primary from Sanders was worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I predict coverage of the World Cup in Russia – when looked back on in a month's time – could be close behind the Korea summit position for all the political BS.https://twitter.com/ed_hannan/status/1006543194077753345 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s indicative of a public which is so polarised to the degree that their ammunition is the most trivial detail that they scrap around for and mistakenly consider potent, while the ‘big picture’ is left for the powerful to shape. How it will affect the deal, I hope not adversely
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
Can't recall seeing anything quite so strange in a long, long time. Borders on weird.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stop taking sides between these two. It's like debating between vomit and diarrhea. Focus on policy and outcome rather than BS perceptions. It's a waste of time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d have to say that Joe Corincione of Ploughshares and the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists people are doing a good job of recognizing that diplomacy with NK is better than war talk while also criticizing the reckless way Trump handles even that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coverage of Syria will be extremely hard to top - top reporters at the NYT, WaPo, and WSJ have actually been relying on sources in Al Qaeda-controlled territory for their reports
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.