Under the guise of Cutting Edge Anti-Trump Progressivism or whatever, Maddow is teaching her audience to be hawkish paranoids. Hannity could never accomplish anything so subtly damaginghttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1006753110918877190 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The thing is, Rachel has every incentive to run with this espionage drama for as long as possible. It’s been enormously lucrative, even if it’s making her viewership progressively dumber and crazier. From fawning 2017 Rolling Stone profile:pic.twitter.com/PhhnIHfXru
She is doing a great job. Deserves some of that Russian oil money for causing more mental harm to already mentally ill generation in America, Underrated asset for Putin together with Joy Reid.
Online folks live life in the fast lane. They can't sit through two or three minutes of Rachel going over pictures of a railway bridge into N. Korea to get to the punchline
I want Trump to nuke Russia, starting WW3, or nuke NorthKorea starting WW3. Thats only way he will prove to me he is not a warmongering dictator, and is a good man of peace like BushJr.
It's astounding to me that you have a job that requires you to understand these kinds of things yet you're so consistently ignorant of them. It's like a car mechanic who doesn't understand how an engine works.
For a leader of a third world economy he's one prolific guy.
When Trump prevailed on Election Night 2016, I remember thinking that the one silver lining was that his presidency might reawaken the antiwar movement which had been dormant for 8 years of Obama's presidency. Never would I have imagined that Dems would become pro-war. SAD!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.