Maria Theresa Norn

@mtnorn

Head of Analysis at the nonprofit think tank & part-time senior researcher at . Tweets on science, innovation & education policy.

Copenhagen, Denmark
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @mtnorn

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @mtnorn

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    Our SI of SMJ, "History‐informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship," now published. Great papers by, e.g., Brent Goldfarb, Oded Shenkar, Roy Suddaby, Eero Vaara, and others.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    1/ Did you know that Vannevar Bush (you know, the guy who helped enable everything from radar to the manhattan project, the NSF to memexes) wrote an autobiography? Turns out that yes he did, it's been out of print since the 70's, and it's *excellent* BOOK REPORT THREAD

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    'The potential of academics as ‘good citizens’ is plausible only when their agency is given license to flourish. This potential is better mobilised when funding formula move away from status competition and towards an honest embrace of the public sphere.'

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Our 3rd contribution to the debate, in which we call for A) upholding a broad conceptualization of science in new policies; B) a better alignment of replication expectations with other forms of quality control

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Call for Special Tracks deadline for is approaching. Please see for details on dates, formats etc.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The landmark policy paper "Science, the Endless Frontier" turns 75 this year. ISSUES editor-in-chief Dan Sarewitz finds its continuing influence troubling.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Around the world, a small but growing movement of experimenters are bringing fresh ideas to how we solve social and public problems. An Inventory published today by and catalogues the contents of the experimenter’s toolbox.

    Poništi
  9. 21. sij

    Interesting insights from new survey of (mostly UK) researchers. A particularly concerning finding: "Creativity is one of the most commonly cited features of an ideal research culture, but 75% of researchers believe it's currently being stifled."

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The post-WWII model for organizing science remains powerful, but moving beyond its limits will be necessary for assuring the contributions of science to solving societal challenges. & explain in their must-read ISSUES essay:

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij
    Poništi
  12. 13. sij
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. sij
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. sij

    "Faculty members say they care most about whether the journal is read by the people they most want to reach—but they think their colleagues care most about journal prestige." Read:

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. sij

    Business model changes are driven by perceived threats rather than opportunities, but constrained by past strategic orientation.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. sij

    Excellent piece by Adam Grant. Management researchers over-emphasize the "counter-intuitive" and the "surprising" (the Murray Davis legacy). However, simple, not-very-surprising insights may be extremely useful to organizations.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. sij

    I ought to like this story a lot, since it highlights the role of cognitive and tangible barriers to entry in the scientific realm. /1

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. pro 2019.

    here’s one for all those people who tell me that publishing null results will just make the research literature boring

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. pro 2019.

    2019 in review: DORA’s list of the top 10 advances in research assessment Check it out!

    Poništi
  20. 19. pro 2019.

    Should we fund research randomly via a lottery model? Paper argues that decentralization of the evaluation and selection process may constitute a better alternative to both lotteries and peer review

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·