26. By this point “everyone knew this was fucked,” said one former employee, but the response was essentially to err on the side of… continuing to err.
Conversation
27. Former VP of Global Comms Brandon Borrman asks, “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?”
1,175
11.6K
69.3K
28. To which former Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker again seems to advise staying the non-course, because “caution is warranted”:
1,661
11.7K
65.8K
29. A fundamental problem with tech companies and content moderation: many people in charge of speech know/care little about speech, and have to be told the basics by outsiders. To wit:
998
11.1K
72.5K
30. In one humorous exchange on day 1, Democratic congressman Ro Khanna reaches out to Gadde to gently suggest she hop on the phone to talk about the “backlash re speech.” Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern.
1,080
11.7K
67.9K
Gadde replies quickly, immediately diving into the weeds of Twitter policy, unaware Khanna is more worried about the Bill of Rights:
1,253
11.4K
64.5K
32.Khanna tries to reroute the conversation to the First Amendment, mention of which is generally hard to find in the files:
2,321
15.6K
76.8K
33.Within a day, head of Public Policy Lauren Culbertson receives a ghastly letter/report from Carl Szabo of the research firm NetChoice, which had already polled 12 members of congress – 9 Rs and 3 Democrats, from “the House Judiciary Committee to Rep. Judy Chu’s office.”
1,475
10.5K
61.9K
34.NetChoice lets Twitter know a “blood bath” awaits in upcoming Hill hearings, with members saying it's a "tipping point," complaining tech has “grown so big that they can’t even regulate themselves, so government may need to intervene.”
933
9,280
50.4K
35.Szabo reports to Twitter that some Hill figures are characterizing the laptop story as “tech’s Access Hollywood moment”:
1,005
8,889
50.1K
36.Twitter files continued:
"THE FIRST AMENDMENT ISN’T ABSOLUTE”
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it's "not absolute"
Replying to
An amazing subplot of the Twitter/Hunter Biden laptop affair was how much was done without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, and how long it took for the situation to get "unfucked" (as one ex-employee put it) even after Dorsey jumped in.
4,407
13.9K
76.6K
Replying to
THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS ABSOLUTE!!!!! JUST SO THESE LIARS CAN HEAR ME SAY IT!!!!!
347
738
6,794
It absolutely isn't, and it applies to the government. Twitter isn't the government and you are subject to their terms of service when you sign up, which I'm sure you haven't read.
Also, the main issue here was revenge porn asked for removal. Lastly, Hunter wasn't a candidate.
66
12
96
Show replies
Replying to
The first amendment isn't absolute? LMAO the 1st amendment IS ABSOLUTE.
288
316
4,061
Show replies
Replying to
Feels like this is missing the point of the bill of rights -- Twitter's a company, not the government, so it can do what it wants
187
10
235
Show replies
Replying to
Hillary absolutely did do something wrong which is why the media wouldn't stop talking about it! What are these people even talking about?
85
138
2,784
Show replies