You can have bearer securities. The purpose of the "token" construct would be to implement such.https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bearerform.asp …
Let's say Alice's tokenized security "wallet" is hacked. So what? Addresses are whitelisted. Plus, securities exist on the books of the issuer; they aren't bearer instruments. In fact, what is even the purpose of the "token" construct for securities?https://www.coindesk.com/tokensoft-launches-wallet-allowing-investors-to-self-manage-security-tokens …
-
-
-
My dude, these things are practically extinct in the US - and if you think the SEC is eager to help repopulate the species via a crypto company, I have an ICO to sell you.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I have yet to hear a decent answer to the question of what problem this solves.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I agree if they're not bearer instruments (or at least *can be* if withdrawn from custodial to a personal wallet), and if they can't be freely traded globally, it defeats the main benefits of tokenization.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Think of them as versatile trading APIs which enables elimination of counterparty risks.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.