Watching nCoV discussion unfold, I’m starting to really like the peer review model of rapidly publishing on arXiv, and hashing out issues via social media. It makes “peer review” look increasingly like the unfair (and fatally slow) ancient process that it is.
You're liking having to wade through a stew of nonsense?https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/1223598414493077505?s=19 …
-
-
Yet the reviews done in the preprint comment section are more thorough than most Anon peer reviews delivered by the old broken system.
-
That sounds like an assumption disguised as a statement of fact.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.