Instead of speaking of ‘free markets’ and buying into liberal propaganda, it’d be more accurate to speak of ‘planning for an individualistic hedonism’. Such a plan can be achieved by restricting the information available to producers, so that they see only ‘consumer demand’.
-
-
The private sphere is restricted in organization and information access. Its departments (corporations) cannot ’collude’ (communicate) in certain ways and they only have access to certain kinds of information for internal planning. This supports individualistic hedonism.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The main alternative is not ‘socialist planning’ but ‘nationalist planning’. All states now run according to the individualistic-hedonistic plan (‘capitalism’) originally developed using nationalist planning, including the US. And it’s still employed for ’national security’.
Prikaži ovu nit -
‘Socialist planning’ encounters a problem because socialism inherits the commitment to individualistic-hedonism from liberalism, but adds the goal of equality. It therefore has to try to plan the individualistic-hedonistic plan. A kind of meta-planning that leads over-planning.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The communist states were developing states that tried to do nationalist planning using ideas from socialist planning (designed for a developed individualistic-hedonistic economy). China transitioned from this to just straightforward nationalist planning (Deng read List).
Prikaži ovu nit -
Thus, ‘capitalism’ is just a kind of planning, partially realized by restricting the plans of subordinate departments (‘private corporations‘), that developed states employ to achieve specifically liberal goals (individualistic hedonism). Anti-liberals must reject it.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.