Marcel Weiher
Michael Tsai
@mpweiher Which dynamic features were removed from Objective-C?
A response to @brentsimmons : “What’s Missing in the Discussion About Dynamic Swift” http://blog.metaobject.com/2016/05/what-missing-in-discussion-about.html … cc: @ccgus @chockenberry
-
-
-
@mjtsai It’s a direction. Static checking has been tightened at every turn, including turning what used to be warnings into errors. -
@mjtsai With ARC, performSelector: and variants are very hard to get right…and ARC in general wants to know types statically. - View other replies
-
@mjtsai But one of the posts had a longer list, trying to find it right now…
-
-
-
@mpweiher What I really like of your ObjST implementation is default support for HOM. That's actually missing in ObjC. -
@thecocoanaut If you like HOM, these guys have taken it to a whole new level: https://youtu.be/GBtqQwcJoN0?t=1846 … http://stefan-marr.de/renaissance/ -
@mpweiher This seems te be a very interesting talk. MUST watch it in its entirety later on. -
@thecocoanaut And about the best name for an OO talk, ever ;-) -
@mpweiher Absolutely! (-:
-
-
@mpweiher “Until real software engineering is developed, the next best practice is to develop with a dynamic system.” Alan Kay -
@mpweiher Of course you already know that. Great article. -
@mpweiher “Im not against types, but I don’t know of any type systems that aren’t a complete pain, so I still like dynamic typing.” Alan Kay -
@mpweiher@brentsimmons@ccgus@chockenberry nice; maybe types will eventually melt away with compiler advances, like GC did with ARC.
Frank Gregor
rentzsch
Norberto Ortigoza
Samuel Ford
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.