I'm sure that won't go wrong like everything else does.
New from @YouTube - CEO Susan Wojciki announces a feature to fight conspiracy theories w/ related links to news, Wikipedia #sxswpic.twitter.com/sLtjdQNqbu
-
-
-
Ah, the old - better to do nothing argument.
- Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
There's no way that turns from conspiracy theories into dissent. Nope.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
I like it in theory, but let's go all the way: linked to entries about science and evolution under every video that's religious or pushing homeopathic bullshit.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
So who deems something a conspiracy? Because to be honest everything is a conspiracy because nobody knows shit. And really, using Wikipedia as a source for credible alternative viewpoints aka
#AlternativeFacts Using#FakeNews to combat#FakeNews seems like MAGA to me..Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
Me lady, thou doth protest too much, me thinks. The MSM is fighting the information war, and they aren't giving up. No russian hacking, no collusion, no bots, just a prostitute. Sounds familiar.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
Wikipedia is biased and untrustworthy. The information is so tainted that even high school teachers have banned it's use. She should spend her time doing something more constructive.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
So they decided to use Wikipedia for that?
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
@thisisdelphin t'as vu ça ? -
oh ! dans un sens, c'est bien, car ça apporte du contexte là où se trouve l'utilisateur, et Wikipedia est une source fiable mais je trouve que c'est facile pour Google ; ils passent la patate chaude aux bénévoles de Wikipedia alors que c'est leur responsabilité
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
So they'll be adding info boxes to articles about "white privilege" and "the Patriarchy"?
- 1 mer svar
Ny konversation -
-
-
Great thing to do! Cudos. : Recently I had thought about a similar thing: An app or add on that helps you to detect verified bullshit while browsing. You could redact + allow users to detect bullshit, too. Maybe/probably moderate the posts. Makes sense? Exists already??
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
Um, rather than "fight" them, why not just disprove them? And does anyone really believe the powers that be NEVER conspire? Surely you don't believe that only small time crooks conspire, right? Skepticism of authority is warranted given the history of corrupted power.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
Anyone who uses wikipedia as a source(for anything) should be publicly shamed.
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
I get that it's very important in times of fake news everywhere, and I quite like the idea, but this could lead to something that censors some ideas and not others. So the question will be: who determine what is good and what is bad? Plus, is Wikipedia the best site for this??
-
The ADL and the SPLC. Yeah, nothing biased about that at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
sounds like china, russia, hitler's germany, etc. this is censorship no matter how you try sell it. you should be able to watch whatever crazy thing people post and decide if it is a conspiracy or not. maureen, how do you get the right to be a censor? dont infringe my rights
Tack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
-
-
So, will it lead to CNN's channel to be removed?
#russiagateTack. Twitter använder detta för att förbättra din tidslinje. ÅngraÅngra
-
Hämtningen verkar ta ett tag
Twitter kan vara överbelastat eller ha tillfälliga problem. Försök igen eller besök Twitter Status om du vill ha mer information.