Ah, the old - better to do nothing argument.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
There's no way that turns from conspiracy theories into dissent. Nope.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So who deems something a conspiracy? Because to be honest everything is a conspiracy because nobody knows shit. And really, using Wikipedia as a source for credible alternative viewpoints aka
#AlternativeFacts Using#FakeNews to combat#FakeNews seems like MAGA to me..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like it in theory, but let's go all the way: linked to entries about science and evolution under every video that's religious or pushing homeopathic bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get that it's very important in times of fake news everywhere, and I quite like the idea, but this could lead to something that censors some ideas and not others. So the question will be: who determine what is good and what is bad? Plus, is Wikipedia the best site for this??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@thisisdelphin t'as vu ça ?
-
oh ! dans un sens, c'est bien, car ça apporte du contexte là où se trouve l'utilisateur, et Wikipedia est une source fiable mais je trouve que c'est facile pour Google ; ils passent la patate chaude aux bénévoles de Wikipedia alors que c'est leur responsabilité
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.