Well, when a school or organization invites him to speak, he is entitled to that agreement letting him speak.
-
-
-
I'm an ACLU member and support 99.9% of their platforms, and you're nitpicking one aspect of this. Ugh.
-
Well duh. I'm refuting your point because I think it's a stupid one. And congrats, I'm a member too!
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
rather than refusing platforms to provocative speakers, why don't campuses promote
#debate? University is for learning -
Milo doesn't debate. Framing it that way legitimizes his position. Don't.
-
framing it in that way makes it sound like you don't want to debate either. Dialogue is far better than division
-
not when one side wants to genocide the other side. They aren't interested in dialogue like you are.
-
Genocide? The left has gone full tard.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
The Nazi party was destroyed in 1945. It's 2017. See? Full tard.
-
you sure got me. Infallible logic.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
.
@mouse_clicker@ACLU He is entitled to not have violence enacted upon him. That riot was an utter disgrace, and I am a liberal. - 1 more reply
-
-
Public colleges are required to protect free speech. This is pretty well established law. And the right approach.
-
Unless he is at a publicly funded school which shuts his speech down. That is a different story.
-
Then neither are you. When did the left wing become so illiberal?
-
-
He got the platform, the university charge him and the students security fees, then antifa riots and shuts him
-
keep it up though, the more you try to silence him, the bigger platform he will get. Didnt learn anything from bekley
-
a lot of people dislike him and disagree with his view, but they are forced to defend him because ppl shut him down
-
milo do debate, just wait until Q&A section, he debated few dissenters and its fairly interesting seeing him challenged
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.