So @TeamYouTube just reinstated at least two white supremacist channels and *apologized* to them and now won’t give an answer to any journalists as to why just because, you know, they have no competition and don’t need to answer for anything.https://boingboing.net/2019/08/29/youtube-reinstated-these-extre.html …
-
-
Replying to @slpng_giants @TeamYouTube
I really don't get why journalists insist on calling white supremacists, "nationalists." They are NOT nationalists. They clearly do not support our NATION. They only support WHITE people.
1 reply 8 retweets 56 likes -
Did you look up the long held meaning?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure. Here ya go: Nationalist noun a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeaponizedVoter @momathena and
This is what it meant when I was growing up, and this is what it means, today. If the journalists can't be bothered to acquire a FUKKING vocabulary, they have no business writing.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @WeaponizedVoter @momathena and
The definition of [racial] nationalism and civic nationalism are different, you can't use the definition of one to define the other. White supremacists by necesssity are white nationalists and vice versa, the desire an ethnostate free of people of colour and "degenerates"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The only diff is intention and methods. The ideology of it is neutral. It requires the human to give it a moral judgement....such as civic.
The world is just perfect until we add that human factor.
And no...supremacists don't mind borders. Ask 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Soldier.