You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Many women in the humanities departments are indeed very able - I met one once - but many are not, and they have often prospered by setting up fanciful ideological courses (especially in women’s studies), which can hardly pretend to be academic at all.pic.twitter.com/81qABTH3G5
What of areas where women are patently unsuited: the army, police, firefighting? They have all been attacked because although women are unsuited to the rough work at the bottom, these areas have enviable managerial opportunities higher up. It’s one more irresistible gravy trainpic.twitter.com/N0Qy7luLJN
Fitness tests that women can’t pass are deemed discriminatory and therefore illegal. Standards are lowered. We don’t need barbarians rushing at the gate to topple our defenders. Women already did the job for them internally.pic.twitter.com/svt4KgKx6K
No one doubts the inferiority of women in physical strength and sport. No football team would think of fielding women against a first-class team of men. Yet Western govts, currently feeling unthreatened by any major power, are prepared to gamble their security on female warriors.pic.twitter.com/2V7CWkTfQm
“Hey anon, you say you believe in equal opportunities for women, but why are there no women in management, or as bishops, or as professors, or heads of big corporations? Why are women paid on average only x percent of what men get paid? I thought you loved me?”pic.twitter.com/ACHjdIjnfU
And as women dominate the universities they dominate the ruling ideology. Every moral judgement of what is left of what Western civ stands for has to pass through the all-pervasive strainer of female self-identity. All matters now put the promotion of women first & foremost.pic.twitter.com/HX4WDZQMTT
Imagine if the church was still an influence. Q’s are raised when female clergy enter. Jesus had only male disciples. Was God’s son then merely a creature of his own culture? Here we see how the entry of women changes entirely the conception of the activity and not for the betterpic.twitter.com/kY58FU1ipO
Indeed while women as individuals have often enhanced what they have joined, the entry of women in general has seldom done much for any area previously dominated by men - except, significantly, bureaucracy.pic.twitter.com/xZm8nSEZXT
The feminist program is to make society, the army, the colleges, corporations, everything, conform to an idea, and the women want to go where the men are, to be fully integrated so that when dirty and unfeminine jobs must be done, there are men to do them.pic.twitter.com/5Af0HKOFSS
Feminists once dreamt of setting up their own societies but then realised they needed to have men around. They wanted to be integrated. And this happened not because political wisdom declared it necessary, nor because electorates pushed for it, but was due to bureaucratic inertiapic.twitter.com/O4spPrdqJb
Let us now return to the question of why the male custodians of our civilisation sold the pass. There are many reasons. One must be cowardice: giving into women’s demands in the hope of a peaceful life. The cuckold husband stab in the back to all the great men who came before.pic.twitter.com/1jumiO2z5d
Our 20th C leaders were white, male, & middle class, and leftists have long been engaged in a campaign to erode the morale of each of these abstract categories. They denoted racism, sexism, and elitism respectively. Men found it difficult not to be written off as evil oppressors.pic.twitter.com/7OhLRYcBjR
Some men were supporters of liberal feminism and believed that radical feminism was merely a rather hysterical version of classical liberalism. Feminists were ok except for one or two angry lesbians!pic.twitter.com/SJlLyNKkWQ
Yet retreat is a notoriously difficult maneuver to control. Each concession can be used to demand further concessions in the name of consistency. Hence the appearance in all Western countries of legislation mandating equal opportunities—and who could possibly be against that?pic.twitter.com/0wUQUywWbC
Women took over the universities, public bodies, firms and, above all, the media. Hiring for status-giving jobs requiring degrees had become closely circumscribed by a set of rules. The dogma was that 50% of all jobs belonged to women, though the reality of quotas was long deniedpic.twitter.com/U6G1s3mlDZ
There are deeper currents too how men let this happen. One of them is that men tend to react to radical feminism with a high-minded feeling that nothing but justice, a notoriously fluid idea, should determine public policy. Men have a sense of fairness built into them.pic.twitter.com/1Yy3AAe43J
Cocooned from the immediate consequences of folly, and increasingly detached from any profound understanding of the culture that had produced them, the trusting trustees of our civilisation have utterly sold out their descendants.pic.twitter.com/1OeJlnrDnO
The big breasts of women, their deep eyes, vivacious curves and full lips - not to mention their shows of innocence and helplessness - all of these have been used as weapons to pull on men’s sense of responsibility and con them into handing over the keys to power.pic.twitter.com/0sg23sgVQs
Did you follow this thread just to gaze at the high-definition photographs of tradwives, insta thots, porn stars and e-girls? Then you are part of the problem. You are part of what made civilisation collapse. You made the woman in this photo possible.pic.twitter.com/zzBnJzgtDQ
This thread is not yet done, but there shall be NO MORE pictures of pretty women accompanying each post. Instead you will be subjected to images of what modern women have become as civilisational restraints have disappeared. If you don’t like, feel free to stop right here.pic.twitter.com/F6l2wk71IP
The feminist revolution is nothing less than a destruction of our civilisation... and it has all happened in such a way that people have not yet realised what has happened. There are some who might say, well, at least it has improved the condition of women. This is a mistake.pic.twitter.com/FQcOf2DReZ
Such a view would accept the fatal dichotomy that men and women have separate destinies. In fact, of course, they do not. Some might think that this thread reeks of misogyny - but it is weak men I save my severest scorn for. They helped cut the ties between the sexes.pic.twitter.com/nUvcV9g2XC
Men who are not allowed to be men become miserable. Women who are not allowed to be women become miserable. Look at the face of this woman in this photo. Look what throwing away all our heritage has done to her. Do you think she is happier than her grandmother?pic.twitter.com/F6VtIOVsPF
Women have specifically feminine qualities of their own which prevent them, as a general rule, from fitting entirely successfully into the structures men have created. No problem, say the feminists: let us change the structures! That can indeed be done, but something is lost.pic.twitter.com/nQngzB7bkv
The point is that “men” put “women” (if we may generalize wildly) on a pedestal, and also despise them as weak; love and adore them in chivalrous terms, but also tend to oppress them and use them. A parallel ambivalence is found in the way women treat men.pic.twitter.com/Nx4bycQPzh
A whole world of games & conventions has grown up around these attitudes, and they look different when viewed from the bar or the bedroom, the saloon or the shop. Feminism is essentially a humorless rationalism which seeks a single right attitude to be forced on men & women alikepic.twitter.com/6v17Yb34IV
There is a further point, and a more complex one. Civilisation only advances because of innovation. It lives off ideas. Sometimes academics attempt the paradoxical business of trying to theorise innovation and creativity, but the results are inevitably banal.pic.twitter.com/VfgM8RM6Jp
Remember way back in this thread when I talked about leisure and how it was viewed by the Ancients? It was these moments of leisure, away from work, where the real thinking was done that gave birth to invention. Without defined gender roles, it’s hard for this leisure to exist.pic.twitter.com/QI9NjBHNzh
And it MUST be men that have the time to contemplate and bring forth the fruits of civilisation. Only men - a small number of a certain type of man at that - are the producers of 99% of all of our civilisation’s advances. Without society’s support, they have no time to advance uspic.twitter.com/WltIaMaV14
Men and women approach boredom and leisure differently. For women, the terror of boredom breeds drama and led to the feminist movement in the first place. For men - some men (those of high intelligence and learning) - it’s their opportunity to philosophise, invent and inspire.pic.twitter.com/p2HQhwCo1W
The reason why this is - the idea of the Head Girl vs the Lone Male Genius - is a whole different thread in itself. To learn more I recommend reading The Genius Famine by Edward Dutton. A copy is here: http://geniusfamine.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-genius-famine-why-we-need-geniuses.html?m=1 …pic.twitter.com/vzGsRof3FO
Creativity is essentially mysterious. What is clear though is that women do not have this capacity to innovate. They bring great talents to developing what Thomas Kuhn called “normal science,” but they have no record of creating the “paradigm shifts” that lead in new directions.pic.twitter.com/y9kJx5YMWX
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
