You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
(I know this is a long and meandering thread but I promise it’s all going to make sense by the end. We’re getting to the collapse. In the meantime, do enjoy the tits.)pic.twitter.com/tcuiF22ZYS
Western civilisation is unusually open compared to others. At various times in the past many women have had access to education. From the 18th century onwards some women developed a taste for taking up professions restricted to men. By the 19th century they were in the colleges.pic.twitter.com/DtkPO0BoQa
In doing so, they often suffered a certain derision from the more brutish among their male confrères. Other men were always on their side, however, and during the first half of the twentieth century women broke into many fields previously restricted by convention. Thanks betas.pic.twitter.com/BLmsB1Bw2V
The openness of Western culture is shown by how many women were enjoying higher education and finding distinction in professional fields as we entered the 20th century. In India widows were still being thrown on funeral pyres and in China women’s feet were still bound.pic.twitter.com/A1gDG9h2tp
The numbers of women who largely devoted their lives to these fields was relatively small, and some people thought this was a problem, but it was only a problem for those who took their bearings from statistics rather than from the responses of actual people.pic.twitter.com/rP0tRBkMri
The key to modern Western civilisation is its openness to talent wherever found. This is the left’s own propaganda: America is special because it welcomes and uses all. Talented women were never shut outside, just as talented Nazi rocket scientists and Indian coders aren’t eitherpic.twitter.com/Y2txCYcVx7
Once women enter a field, especially combined with relativism, the protectors of a status quo have no weapon to stop the advance. Women have always demanded what they want, and that continues when they enter workplaces and electorates.pic.twitter.com/kZlM55RJEQ
Our previous boomer elites acquiesced that all moral and religious ideas on gender were merely subjective. They could not agree on a defense, and the attack often came from within their own families. The goal of the attack was to get women into the higher ranks of the workplace.pic.twitter.com/zv60E90tRn
In earlier times women didn’t want to work. The world of work outside the cosy hearth was hardly inviting. Farming required relentless physical input beyond the strength of most women; nor did many express a wish to exercise the broadsword.pic.twitter.com/kyn3enYxRW
Today? Getting women to work isn’t hard since the thing called “work” is now largely done in centrally heated offices in front of a PC with a nice chair & other women. In the push-button world men have created, physical strength is never needed, especially in more attractive jobspic.twitter.com/Hm4WC5AC1O
Work had been the curse of Adam, parallel with childbirth as the curse of Eve, but work is now a rather agreeable shuffling of symbols in an office full of friendship and event. Very little work happens in female-dominated workplaces: it’s just endless drama and snacking.pic.twitter.com/J1ddqe6qRf
It is not difficult to present this kind of work—the kind that interested the humanities graduates who largely fuelled the radical movement—as a liberation from the confinement of family life and the tedious babble of the toddler.pic.twitter.com/jVgFu4XVe6
This also fits the socialist view that a person’s value is their contribution to the welfare of others. Leftists have long dreamt of absorbing the family into society: everyone living communally, women working alongside men. The final achievement of justice against oppression.pic.twitter.com/Cu6rcOWfI4
How did the feminist revolution succeed? Don’t kid yourselves that it didn’t. You live in a matriarchy now. But before men held most of the cards and still lost. How? What happened?pic.twitter.com/G4yhhMuUgW
It’s the evils of democracy. It’s the result of not believing in a moral code. It’s of opening the door a little and assuming it won’t be booted wide. It’s also due to men’s biology who are built to protect women and are prone to their manipulation. Enjoying the girl photos?pic.twitter.com/eKg85FVK1z
A small group campaigning for benefits will always prevail against a large majority whose direct interests are but marginally affected. Feminists were a small group, but their message rang at some level to most women, & most men had wives/daughters whose good they wished to help.pic.twitter.com/epToHxkNPi
No political party ever took up all of th Feminist program, but it did electoral prospects no harm to convey a general sympathy for the cause, and once in government enthusiasts would advance legislation under the motherhood slogan of equal opportunity.pic.twitter.com/HOQstaXEdW
Very soon a network of powerful bureaucracies was bringing radical doctrine to bear on all areas of government. The courts could be relied upon to extend their power by regulating contract and by extending the law of tort.pic.twitter.com/vAVYLBtMnW
Within a generation, the revolution had not only succeeded but also created throughout Western nations an occupying army of equal opportunity officers entrenched in personnel departments up and down the country.pic.twitter.com/11uhcxzsiC
And now we get to female quotas in the workplace!pic.twitter.com/Ii79aqLidx
There are of course some workspaces where women don’t demand too many rights. These areas are either where women graduates have no wish to go (rough outdoor work) or where lack of ability could lead to instant disaster, such as brain surgery or piloting commercial aircraft.pic.twitter.com/KPt9WuMJST
Colleges are a soft touch because the consequences of educational betrayal take decades to emerge. The effect of diversity quotas has been to fill humanities departments with women in order to equalize numbers “distorted” by STEM where even passably able women are hard to find.pic.twitter.com/1WhE2Jjcei
Many women in the humanities departments are indeed very able - I met one once - but many are not, and they have often prospered by setting up fanciful ideological courses (especially in women’s studies), which can hardly pretend to be academic at all.pic.twitter.com/81qABTH3G5
What of areas where women are patently unsuited: the army, police, firefighting? They have all been attacked because although women are unsuited to the rough work at the bottom, these areas have enviable managerial opportunities higher up. It’s one more irresistible gravy trainpic.twitter.com/N0Qy7luLJN
Fitness tests that women can’t pass are deemed discriminatory and therefore illegal. Standards are lowered. We don’t need barbarians rushing at the gate to topple our defenders. Women already did the job for them internally.pic.twitter.com/svt4KgKx6K
No one doubts the inferiority of women in physical strength and sport. No football team would think of fielding women against a first-class team of men. Yet Western govts, currently feeling unthreatened by any major power, are prepared to gamble their security on female warriors.pic.twitter.com/2V7CWkTfQm
“Hey anon, you say you believe in equal opportunities for women, but why are there no women in management, or as bishops, or as professors, or heads of big corporations? Why are women paid on average only x percent of what men get paid? I thought you loved me?”pic.twitter.com/ACHjdIjnfU
And as women dominate the universities they dominate the ruling ideology. Every moral judgement of what is left of what Western civ stands for has to pass through the all-pervasive strainer of female self-identity. All matters now put the promotion of women first & foremost.pic.twitter.com/HX4WDZQMTT
Imagine if the church was still an influence. Q’s are raised when female clergy enter. Jesus had only male disciples. Was God’s son then merely a creature of his own culture? Here we see how the entry of women changes entirely the conception of the activity and not for the betterpic.twitter.com/kY58FU1ipO
Indeed while women as individuals have often enhanced what they have joined, the entry of women in general has seldom done much for any area previously dominated by men - except, significantly, bureaucracy.pic.twitter.com/xZm8nSEZXT
The feminist program is to make society, the army, the colleges, corporations, everything, conform to an idea, and the women want to go where the men are, to be fully integrated so that when dirty and unfeminine jobs must be done, there are men to do them.pic.twitter.com/5Af0HKOFSS
Feminists once dreamt of setting up their own societies but then realised they needed to have men around. They wanted to be integrated. And this happened not because political wisdom declared it necessary, nor because electorates pushed for it, but was due to bureaucratic inertiapic.twitter.com/O4spPrdqJb
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
