An artificial system can be self-aware (functionally speaking) of itself and its relation to the environment. Ergo, this is just another empirical hypothesis, there is still no task *proof* of consciousness. Consciousness, unlike memory attention etc, is NOT a functional notion.
-
-
-
It may have minimal self-awareness, but not 'self-consciousness' proper
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yes, it serves the purpose of us doing things instead of lying down dead.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
||scientists often cannot escape from the view that consciousness is an epiphenomenon that plays no role|| They could if they abandoned their materialism and mechanistic conception of reality. I argue that necessarily consciousness is causally efficacious http://ian-wardell.blogspot.com/2019/11/a-causal-consciousness-free-will-and.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What is the function of gravity, why does spin exist? If consciousness is fundamental then the question is ill-possed. According to Russellian monism, consciousness is what matter is made of, the part and parcel of being.
-
I think it's possible for a system to perform all the functions of self-aware, environment-predictive creatures without being conscious itself. A better question would ask why evolution tends to accumulate consciousness in being like ourselves, making it more complex.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.