-
-
Replying to @johnobeto
@johnobeto@sjvn@ZDNet but with SecureBoot always on. Ok,@linuxfoundation accepted the Microsoft racket… just don't expect BSD on it :D1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mmu_man
@mmu_man@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation LOL Yes. Do you mean SecureBoot doesn't allow Linux? I thought I read somewhere that it [now] does..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnobeto
@johnobeto@sjvn@ZDNet as I said,@linuxfoundation had to buy a key from MS to sign their own bootloader (which then becomes non-free).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mmu_man
@mmu_man@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation How much is a key though? Isn't that just key-signing authority? Isn't that cost negligible?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnobeto
@johnobeto@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation it's more a question of freedom I think.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @mmu_man
@mmu_man@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation But there are - and should be - limited limits to freedom. Wanton freedom fast becomes anarchy /11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnobeto
@mmu_man@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation In this case, securing the OS benefits all. I see it, if that's the only issue, as a plus.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnobeto
@johnobeto@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation it should be about securing the *user*, not the OS vendor market shares.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mmu_man
@mmu_man@sjvn@ZDNet@linuxfoundation What? Surely Microsoft doesn't need Linux's less than 1% desktop market share for anything, right?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@johnobeto @sjvn @ZDNet @linuxfoundation it all goes back to this: http://birdhouse.org/beos/byte/30-bootloader/ … poke @shacker @gassee
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.