This was a consistent trend in both the Post and the Times.pic.twitter.com/X39WCuOLmW
Show this thread
New: We did a study of @nytimes and @washingtonpost news and political coverage over two months. Republicans were quoted far more than Democrats. http://mm4a.org/ZCg pic.twitter.com/CLC7MeF1yL
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not much of an excuse, but could it be that R's where just saying alot more ridiculous nonsense that needed to be reported?
-
I find that a factor worth considering, but it also see the fallacy in branding the media liberal.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Translation white men
-
Yes, exactly. I'd like to see a similar race/gender analysis....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Classic squeaky wheel scenario. The thing is, the NY Times & Washington Post know this &they do it anyway. Controversy sells. Fear sells. Liars lying sells. What are we to think other than American media lets the whole country down. You're the Fourth Estate. Act like that matters
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. So tell me again who the
#MSM is helping? Cause it sure isn’t the Democratic Party.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The
@nytimes and@washingtonpost gave Trump and other Republicans tons of free publicity—the *opposite* of what should have happened.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Big money buys ads--and votes Republican.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can you do a sunday talk show appearance graph?
-
and then maybe a "trump voter" post-election article graph vs. "obama voter" post-election article?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.