It’s also trivially easy to describe cases where a doctor could have made an “error” not matter what they do. It’s always easy to look back and say what should have been done.
-
-
And if you think the quacks won't keep cherry picking those numbers and claim "cover-up" if better, lower numbers are published, you're astonishingly naive.
-
David, in what universe do you think this continually abrasive and rude tone is either useful or professional? Knock it the hell off, will you? Act like a person Yes, improving on the existing numbers will result in far less leverage for quacks than setting fire to it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
hahaha
End of conversation
-
-
-
Oh do tell me pleeeeeeeease! What you are talking about? The success rate of mandatory substance abuse treatment programs ordered by state medical boards? Do tell...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.