Three cycles back:https://politi.co/2VK3jzI
Show this thread
There's a quadrennial journalism discussion around whether to vote or not. @peterbakernyt on why he doesn't https://nyti.ms/2wixqnw pic.twitter.com/9a0rbmZLNN
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So he will never make up his mind that one side can be right or wrong? Sounds helpful.
-
that's what got us here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In which "objectivity" is defined as "self-neutering"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Am researching a radio doc on Kent State Massacre. Tom Wicker went to massive demo a few days later in DC ( so did I). He was not on assignment. He knew he was a citizen first, a journalist second
-
In the 1970s Wicker was an opinion columnist, and hence not subject to the ‘restrictions on advocacy’ placed (properly) on the news staff, as the
@nytimes took care to note in his obituary. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Willful ignorance as to which side is telling the truth is not the answer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a cowardly cop-out by Baker.
-
He has been NYT chief WH reporter for over 3 years and saw him few months ago on TV where he said that he cannot read Trump mind even when it's so obvious for anyone what Trump is saying & doing. He and many of his cohorts normalize Trump vileness, lies, & isnanity all the time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.