While also claiming that she never SAW the tapes.
-
-
-
exactly, how could she know it would hurt officers in the field if she did not view the tapes? And the republicans using their time to kiss her ass makes me want to throw up. Why do we even have to listen to them?
-
She claims she understood (as in, read a report of the contents or was briefed) that the tapes showed officers' faces and implied she feared they would be leaked. Which still seems like a very bad reason to destroy evidence.
-
Could have blacked out the officers faces.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well that's one way of looking at it however the fact remains they destroyed the tapes because they KNEW what they had done was wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SenFeinstein wouldn't the actions of CIA officers have posed a risk to officers in the field? It's not that there was evidence of wrongdoing that created the risk--it was the misconduct of CIA officers under Haspel's command that is problematicThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, Gina.
-
Why are you supporting a terrorist vs soldiers/officers for US?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
she literally just said she wouldn't support legal-but-immoral activities, so I guess she developed a conscience in the last 12 years?
-
What is immoral about water boarding? Is what Obama did to Libya then also immoral? He has their President murdered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To say nothing about the humans beings who were tortured. Extraordinary.
-
They are talking about a man who had the USS Cole bombed. Do you not care about US soldiers?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Her ACTIONS endangered US lives. She created new enemies She made it OK for other countries to do same She ensured enemies would seek revenge In the process Haspel was stripped of her humanity. She Should NOT be in government, much less the CIA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So she openly admits to destroying evidence of torture?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
could harm them by showing their war crimes...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds a little like a crime.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Could harm political careers, including her own.
-
Meaning let terrorists have it easy?
-
Meaning use more effective (and moral) methods. Torture vics say anything to make it stop... whether accurate or not.
Besides, you can't win a war of good against evil by being evil.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.