Mike Pompeo...just stated twice, using the words "the President has been very clear"....it's starting to sound like a WH briefing not an INTEL Hearing.
-
-
-
I agree. Sounds BS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pompeo is coming across as trying to protect Drumpf.
-
He is in the bag for
@trump, sems like. -
But he kept answering in a round about way. Just “yes trumpf directed you to focus on Russian election interference or no he didn’t”. Also the response to Drumpf’s failure to action on the Russian sanctions
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wray seems to be the only one that is not trying to protect Trump.
-
Which means he’s on Trump’s FBI firing hit list.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are my hero. Perfect questioning and they all squirm trying to make POTUS look as though he actually cares about Russian hacking. That was a telling line of questions and answers. Thank You
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why on God's green Earth do we stand for this forking answer
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Lots of fancy ways to say 'no'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@maggieNYT ... actually Pompeio said that “significant effort in CIA and entire IC to push back against the Russian threat that he would discuss in further detail during private session.” Obviously harder to do fake news when its a televised hearing but Manu gives it an effort. -
Actually he was quoting Wray, but I'll give you credit for a valiant effort.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Okay. Has the president* peronally or specifically directed them to, say, bang suspects' heads against the sides of cars? Those two answers combined might give us a sense of whether he understands the law. Me, I'm not optimistic. I don't think he understands toaster pastries.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is there a question as to whether, or not, we will combat all attempts to deter Russian attacks on our elections? Our leaders aren't interested in stopping Russia. It appears that they are colluding with Russia!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump has already answered this himself! Undermined Obama sanctions before even in office. Changed GOP platform language on Ukraine. Refuse to implement sanctions on Russia Refuse to admit Russian interference Non stop Putin butt kissing. The obvious answer is No he didn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be more honest to answer this as a “No”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m not sure nuanced is the right word here: more like evasive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an outrage. Where are the Republicans? I can’t hear them, yet my hearing is just fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meaning the meddling goes on, because republicans can’t win unless they cheat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.