Also of note: When Podesta was asked about Fusion GPS ties, his attorney in room was MARC ELIAS, attorney whose firm retained Fusion GPS
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Burr: Revelations of DNC/Clinton payments will "require us to dig a lot deeper in some areas that maybe a week ago we weren't planning to"
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Podesta met with Senate Intel last month; DWS met with panel this month. Elias firm says they weren't informed then.http://snpy.tv/2zaflrS
CNN
VideoSee more at cnn.comShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looks to me,
@GOP first payed for#SteeleDossier, ignored it. GPS took to#Clinton Campaign or#DNC who took to@FBI. OK, got it!
New conversation -
-
-
"Against the law to lie to Congress." Absolutely-and as long as that law is applied across the board as it should be, it's all good.
-
Kushner, Sessions, Manafort, Flynn and on an on. Some should be charged multiple times.
-
Seems that law will only be upheld against one side. You can taste the hypocrisy.
-
It's in the same section of the Republican playbook as email servers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So the theory now is that DWS and Podesta colluded with Russia to elect Trump?
-
There’s no theory.. just mass media hysteria
-
To be fair, I don’t think anyone (except Mueller) has enough info to know what really happened. I will be interested in his findings.
-
We may not be privy to Mueller's findings. We need an non-partisan, 9/11-style commission w subpoena power, so the public gets info.
-
Honestly, I am okay with not knowing every gory detail. I will trust Mueller to do his job. Let me worry about other things.
-
I'm not talking about every gorey detail. He's not obligated to reveal one iota to the public. If no charges occur, we'll likely know zilch.
-
Agreed. But, if I have faith in Mueller and nothing come from investigation, then I’d be satisfied it was a nothing burger (doubt it, btw)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Opposition Research is not illegal. Why are reporters buying into this story?
-
Right? And why doesn't the person(s) who commissioned the research just say so?
-
Because the one who started it is republican.
-
They need to get a spine, then. What are they so afraid of? What's Trumpski gonna do? NUFFIN.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.