Perhaps because there was actual vetting, disclosure and divesting in 2009? Just a thought.
-
-
-
Just throwing another thought out there - Perhaps the 2009 nominees were actually qualified?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Phil_Mattingly Of the 7 how many had zero public service record and/or massive priv industry potential for conflicts of interest?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Phil_Mattingly Democrats need a backbone. Think of oil like drugs and just say NOThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“allowed” ? What does that even mean? They either got confirmed or they did not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.