-
-
-
Whoever did it thank you I truly needed to laugh today!



-
Saw it on FB with the tag
@ElaraPictures and Safdie Brothers (@JOSH_BENNY ?) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Does the public get to see the report????
-
For that matter will ALL the Senators, including Democrats get to see the FBI’s Kavanaugh report? All 100 Senators are required to participate in advise and consent. There was that skeezy time in yesterday’s “hearing” when Dems had not been provided documents Being asked about.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If I were Kavanaugh, I would be sweating right now. Somehow I doubt he wanted his past examined under a microscope.
-
I think he is. I think his outraged, defiant, rude testimony presentation was not so much abt outrage at being "falsely accused" but rather panicked terror of his criminal conduct in his teens/ twenties is now uncovered. He likely has been a decent family man since, but not then
-
Learned to reign in his sexual aggression with age, smarter @ concealing it,but clearly still plenty of aggression. Something’s up w his $ too-good reason to fear what else FBI might find- covered w self righteous indignation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why haven’t we heard a message of support from Kavaunagh to reopening this FBI background investigation?
-
I'll give you one guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For the sake of public credibility, I sure hope the
@FBI has an equal number female agents assigned to this case. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah like we’re supposed to trust that turtle to do the right thing...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Limited in scope needs to be closely scrutinized, especially given the mushrooming controversies and potential crimes revolving around Kavanaugh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is...too easy? I find something unsettling with how quickly this has moved along. No Trump tantrum. Either they're ready to drop Kavanaugh or they're real confident the FBI won't find anything (and know this...somehow).
-
How can you conduct a credible investigation in under a week? You can't. Its already a forgone conclusion.
-
Yeah, I agree with that, but I read that the Anita Hill FBI probe took 3 days. So, that is either good (they can move fast) or bad (that was a shitshow). The time limit is troubling. But a week is enough time to potentially find SOMETHING. It's their confidence that worries me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
OK... but shouldn't the FBI also determine when the investigation is over, rather than just like 168 hours after it starts?
-
July 1, 1982. It started off like any other day. Me and Judge - getting some ‘skis to ply the lovely young... Oh, I’m sorry - my name is Brett. I’m going to tell you how I fucked up my life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.