But what are they determining to be ‘credible’ .... isn’t that the catch?
-
-
-
July 1st, 1982. It’s going to be a very important date, Rose.
-
I totally agree. I think their council ‘caught’ him on that in the hearing AND that would be on their ‘record’.
-
It was stunning to see Mrs. Mitchell take it right up to that date and then wham the GOP abandoned using her. But hey, hopefully the FBI answers these questions.
-
Mitchell came out of this w her creds intact.
@GOP not so much. Shame on all those men.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What does "credible" mean?
-
Avenatti has obviously arranged for his client to give a TV interview.https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1045659704205234176 …
-
Ramirez is willing to testify. Will she be interviewed?
-
They're both willing to testify. Grassley et al will try to limit the FBI investigation to Prof Ford's case, of course, but I don't think @MichaelAventatti will let that happen.
-
Should add it's not about testifying before the Committee (yet.) It's about who the FBI interview (and lying to them is a federal offence, as those who lied to Mueller have discovered.)
-
And how much of the FBI report can be made public.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are these demands coming from the person or entity that may have just lost $200,000?
-
oh.....now that......is sharp.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Don't look at the money problems - the gambling, the mortgages, the shady ticket deals. Don't look at any of that stuff because that's the bread and butter of the GOP."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
All three women?
-
Five, I thought...although one is anonymous...?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Which "credible" allegations would those be? Only Ford's?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.