Advance pronouncement of ... there’s nothing to see here ... from the committee that claims it’s doing a thorough investigation. Seems to be manufactured ... or ignored ... evidence.
-
-
-
Evidence of what? She named 4 people who directly refute her account. She can't remember the date, location, etc. Her account has multiple inconsistencies. What more do you need to see?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You can't find what you're not looking for.https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1043960771204411392 …
-
Kind of like how you can't seat a nominee if you don't giv ehim a hearing.https://www.npr.org/2016/10/17/498328520/sen-mccain-says-republicans-will-block-all-court-nominations-if-clinton-wins …
-
"has disgraced his office, the legal system and the American people by having sex with a 22-year-old intern and turning her life into a shambles — callous and disgusting behavior that has somehow gotten lost in the shuffle,” Mr. Kavanaugh wrote.
-
Yeah, he was talking about Clinton? There was actual EVIDENCE from that case. She was an intern, people saw them together and the uh.. blue dress. Ford has zero evidence and everyone she claims was at the party denies there ever was a party.
-
The evidence came as a result of an INVESTIGATION. Just like in most rape cases, it's hard to develop facts when powerful people block investigation in the first place. Also, you are misstating facts when you call these denials. They are "do not recall" statements. Different.
-
People she claims were there say they don't remember the party she's speaking of. That's a NO, not a maybe. If they investigated it, this would be closed in record time. She makes an accusation, names four other people, provides no evidence and the other 4 know nothing about it
-
It's not a no, it's an I don't remember. And why would the people not in the room? They weren't attacked. The other two - Kavanaugh & Judge - have every reason to lie about it. People who've committed crimes usually do.
-
It's a no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not corroborating a story is not refuting it either. That much should go without saying but apparently the Senate Committee thinks people won't know that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So there waaas a party? ....drip drip drip...waiting
-
What? All the witnesses said they have no knowledge of any party lol
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The “investigation” led by a lawyer that tweeted, his “unfazed” determination to confirm Kavanaugh and relied on attorney drafted letters rather than actual witness interviews? Can’t believe they are even bothering with that phrasing, there was no investigation, just a coverup.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile, they are bartering her witnesses Thursday. They want no part of the truth. They don’t give a shit about what’s right. They just want to win. They are about ego and greed at any price to the country and that’s the end of that.
-
Siri typo. What I said was they are blocking her witnesses.
-
Marie, u should volunteer to be a witness. You'd be as good as any. Check with Chucky Shumer, he'll walk you through.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Might I remind you that Hillary is having a lovely time and trump is in the toilet and perhaps headed to prison?
-
You don't need to remind of that because just like everything else you libtards say it's false. Just because u want something to be true doesn't make it so. Time will tell Mary! ......CA Berkeley area?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
