Damage control? He is trying to tell the truth and stop the media from tweeting crap like this. Do better Manu!
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He didn’t pursue, or authorize recording Trump, but did he say it jokingly ? If he did, not smart.
-
Trump on live TV literally called on Russia to hack the former Secretary of State with the promise of being “greatly rewarded” and they began hacking her that very night, and his fans say it was just a joke. So Rosenstein should get a pass for sarcasm.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There’s lots of issues but I’d focus on a Mark Judge subpoena. There’s literally no argument not to interview 1 of 3 people who saw it. You can’t say he said/she said if someone else saw it Call the GOP insincere b/c mark my words, they know Judge will bring it all crashing down
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NYT should be the one doing damage control
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hate to say this, but the Washington Post wouldn’t have gotten played like this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe avoid editorializing so blatantly?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe this honorable man!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And, Trump is a fool. Politicians and citizens are the majority who will attempt to vote hm out. He is not worthy of the Office. I am ashamed of Republican Congress that follow him like lemmings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe him!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damage Control? A bit much.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
NYT: here’s some shit that will do damage Rod: I didn’t do that.. NYT: ooohhhhh “damage control!!”
-
If he had pursued that it would be easily provable so I would have to believe him. For the The NY Times sake I hope their sources “who were not in the room” don’t work in the White House or they just very clearly assisted Trump in his quest to undermine the Mueller investigation.
-
And Doesn’t seem ‘off’ that Trump isn’t tweeting about this at all? As if he wasn’t surprised by the news
-
Yeah. If this were truly news to him he would have lost his shit. Just like when the anonymous WH official wrote the OPed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rosenstein parts his hair with a straight razor and looks like he uses a tip calculator for 1 beer. I believe him over these Breitbartish stories that are so obviously being amplified by Russian Bots & Trump TV which = the same thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the NYT’s got played...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.