Ford’s attorney told Judiciary staff that she is open to testifying next Thursday in a public hearing in Washington assuming her safety is guaranteed, Kavanaugh testify first and no outside counsels question her. She wants them to subpoena Mark Judge. GOP will now mull it over
-
-
I know this is NOT a criminal action, but shouldn’t he at least have the right to face his accuser as guaranteed by the 6th Amendment? If he can’t enjoy the presumption of innocence then at least let him face his accuser.
-
Let me get this straight. You want a victim who JUST came forward with an accusation AND has had to move out of her house because of death threats to sit in the same room as the person who victimized her and caused life long trauma? Can anyone say revictimization?
-
She is only the victim if she is telling the truth. So far there is no evidence. Perhaps if someone accused your husband then you may appreciate the rights our Constitution guarantees.
-
If my husband were accused he would happily take himself to a jailhouse and turn himself in for charges, because he’s a real man. He would also get to face his accuser in court, where the constitution guarantees, not in some shame of a committee trying to rush things through.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are FAKE News! Extortion by Ford’s lawyer and Democrats includes: - not under oath - defense first then the prosecution - accused not in the room - lawyers not allowed - etc. MAKE A MOCKERY OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM! Are you Earth or Cardassian Media?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How can Kavanaugh go first when all he can say is “I have no idea what you are talking about?”. Are dates and times of said incident going to be provided prior?
-
He could confess!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Let the FBI investigate
-
They do not have jurisdiction, nor any reason to do so
-
They absolutely do. It's part of his background investigation. They just need the WH to request it to be updated.
-
They investigated Anita Hill’s allegations...these trumpers just invent their own reality
-
Didn't vote for trump, I just prefer my reality based on facts.
-
Well the fact is, the fbi did an investigation of Anita Hills allegations so clearly such a thing is within their purview
-
Correct, and the same people saying it can't happen now were calling it appropriate then.pic.twitter.com/uOHz2uqHSY
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@JbkJbk1234@NotPeoriaMayor Hey guys, do you think what Dr Ford's lawyer is asking for & what the redlines are make sense? Is this normal lawyering? -
None of this normal.
-
I realize that, but what I'm asking is do you think what the lawyer is asking for is over the line or not
-
In a normal legal proceeding, non-party witnesses have no say in who is called by the parties and very little say over when or whether they'll appear. But this is political. Wanting Judge to testify under oath strikes me as reasonable.
-
Thanks for answering
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.