Grassley won’t bring Don Jr back after reports that Cohen may contradict his account and say Trump knew of mtg with Russians. "If he misled the committee, he's lying to Congress. That's a crime. And that'd be up to the prosecutors, not me." w @jeremyherbhttps://cnn.it/2LAADWn
-
-
The Watergate investigation had 320 hours of public televised hearings. The public could ascertain themselves if a witness did not appear to be honest. Were in the hell are the public hearings in the Russia Election Interference probe
@ChuckGrassley? -
This is an outstanding point. Thus far, they have refused to make testimony public.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Weird how Grassley received campaign funding from Philip Anschutz’s associates; Kavanaugh likely put Gorsuch at the top of the 10th Circuit short list because of a glowing letter from Philip Anschutz; Anschutz gave Senate Leadership Fund $500k one day before Mitch shut down...
-
...any consideration for Garland, and Anschutz gave $250K to SLF last December—weeks before McConnell’s Federalist Society Advisor wife had a private dinner with Gorsuch and Senate Judiciary Committee Member Cornyn. Noteworhy that SLF bils itself as “closely tied” to McConnell.
-
Senate Leadership Fund’s treasurer was treasurer of Kentuckians For Strong Leadership, from which all 2014 expenditures went to oppose McConnell’s opponent. Trump gave KFSL $50,000 in 2013; he and Wilbur Ross each gave $10,000 on the same date in 2014.
-
Elaine Chao’s a former News Corp Director, with a brother in law on the 21st Century Fox board with Viet Dinh, who worked with Starr on Whitewater and was a partner at Kirkland & Ellis...as was Kavanaugh. Chao appointed two K&E partners (Rosen and Bradbury) into SES positions.
-
Not that there’s anything illegal about a handful of closely associated people controlling both the United States Supreme Court and the administration’s favorite media source, I guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is there even a committee then
-
Take a look at the Republicans who are on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Your question is valid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fair enough from Senator Grassley. I assume that means he wants Mueller to use every power in his arsenal to investigate, including subpoena of POTUS!
-
My first reaction was to give
@ChuckGrassley the benefit of the doubt also. Then I remembered his actions over the last year-and-a-half and quickly realized how highly unlikely it is that his motives are altruistic. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
dereliction of duty by
@GOP in congress. It's all partisan crap. This kind of behavior is destroying the country.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ChuckGrassley And this is exactly why no one feels they need to tell the truth to the Senate...useless!@SenFeinsteinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a joke. He could easily subpoena the records and find out for himself. He simply doesn't want to know the answer either way.
-
That's because he already knows the answer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ChuckGrassley You are failing to comply with your Oath of Office!!! CRIMINALhttps://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1024030543170732032 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anything that will validate truths, GOP dont want any parts of it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still covering up for the
#LiarInChief@ChuckGrassley your legacy with be the#StainOfTrump#TrumpRussiaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In other words, they all know and don't care.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.