I asked Nunes’ office for a comment on the contradiction but got a response attacking CNN instead
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw the documents, he lied about the content. The document is out now and his lies are exposed. What are these people hiding with their lies?
-
No he didn't. You may want to read it again & then watch that clip again. Everything in this clip has been said already. Nunes was specifically saying the court was not made aware that it was the Clinton campaign/DNC that funded the dossier. What is shown here is exactly what we
-
we were told. The Dems claim the court was made aware that it was partially for political purposes. Which is true according to this document. The problem is, & this is what Nunes said, that they weren't told specifically who it was. THAT MATTERS! AND IT DOES NOT SAY THAT IN HERE!
-
What specific names were mentioned of 3rd parties in there? NONE. Nunes said the court wasn't aware the source of the dossier. The truth is, court was aware.
-
I didn't say anything about a third party. Nunes said the court was not told who paid for the dossier. THEY WERE NOT TOLD IT WAS PAID FOR BY THE CLINTON/DNC. They were not told. You are reading into something the way you want to because it suits what you want to believe.
-
What does it matter if it was Hillary Clinton or Chris Christie or Santa Claus? They clearly said they believed the dossier was made to discredit the Trump campaign.
-
The Presidential election is a high stake election. It goes without saying that oppo research is designed to be used as leverage. Nothing wrong with that bc oppo research is allowed. BUT, when one campaign is accusing the other of colluding with a foreign country to hurt their
-
candidacy & then something like the dossier comes out & the FBI uses it to begin an investigation as well as a warrant to spy on someone in the opponents campaign, then it matters who paid for it. Question, if it wasn't a big deal then why isn't she named in it?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yep. Nunes lies as easily as tRump.
#TreasonCaucus#VoteThemOut - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You are parsing words & not being honest & this is where it creates 'fake news". Nunes specifically said the FBI did not tell the courts in the FISA warrant that it was the Clinton camp/DNC that paid for the dossier. That was the problem from the start. This document backs up
-
Nunes. This document states that the" US person never told Source #! of their motivation for the information & the FBI only "speculated" that the information they were seeking was to find damaging information on Candidate #1's campaign. NOT ONCE DOES IT SAY CLINTON PAID FOR IT
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There should be consequences for lying to the American people.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Tell us who 'source #1' is.. Source #1 had (in a previous life) provided the FBI info on corruption in the world of soccer..of all things..so that made 'it' a reliable conduit of info! Now how credible is that?
-
Christopher Steele
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If James Comey, who signed the FISA application, couldn't figure out who funded the dossier, how could a judge?http://thefederalist.com/2018/07/24/james-comeys-words-suggest-fbi-doj-hid-dossiers-funding-fisa-judge …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nunes is comprised, he should never have been allowed to conduct this investigation after he worked on the transition team for Trump. More obstruction of justice I see the more I’m convinced he may be implicated
@SpeakerRyan allowed this shit show.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nunes is competing with Conway
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.