Just spoke with John Cornyn, who is bullish about the prospects of any of the four SCOTUS picks, telling me that “the outcome is relatively certain” because of the change in filibuster rules. He thinks the nom will respect precedent to help alleviate Collins/Murkowski concerns
-
-
Can someone explain this logic? If the pick is confirmed, how would that energize GOP voters?
-
Bizarre. It sounds like wishful thinking on his part.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JohnCornyn would never do the honorable thing. How can he justify letting a criminal pick a SCOTUS? Why...because John wants Russian interference.pic.twitter.com/paSZ4NDiYS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This issue is will make Democrats come out and vote not just Republicans. Making this seem easy is a mistake. Oh well, let them learn the hard way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think Cornyn, like many of the other Republicans, are holding their breath and hoping for the best in the mid-terms. Cruz is on the chopping block.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Anyone else thinking GOP really doesn’t want Roe overturned... they’d never get their voters out again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.