Ryan argues dispute over documents from Rosenstein is not about giving Trump pretext to fire him as Dems contend. Here's our exchange: http://www.snappytv.com/tc/8280026
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rosenstein clearly states that the DOJ will not be extorted. Why is it Congressional Republicans think Donald Trump deserves to know what it is the FBI has on him?

-
Why doesn’t SOMEBODY ask f**king
@SpeakerRyan WHY DEVIN NUNES IS STILL EVEN ON THE HPSIC??? He is a co-conspirator who has a demonstrated habit of leaking sensitive info to subjects of the#RussiaGate investigation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“I am supportive of making sure we get the documents we rightly deserve…” Well since they don’t rightly deserve those documents, I guess he’s siding with Rosenstein.
-
The master of obfuscation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hmm...seems to me I remember Nunes not turning over documents requested by the House Intelligence Committee....?
-
WHY IS NUNES STILL ON THAT COMMITTEE???? This should by the only question anyone asks
@SpeakerRyan
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh so now oversight is important? That’s too bad that it wasn’t important when Exec Branch witnesses were practically giving Intel Committee members the middle finger.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excellent -so Paul Ryan should be included on those texts & emails that Rod Rosenstein receives in Discovery when he takes these crooks to court!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought his standard answer now was "I haven't been paying attention"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ryan is in duck & cover mode.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here you have Erik Prince admitting that NY FBI agents leaked info to him about Hillary days before election..http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/ …
-
He actually said NYPD, not the NY FBI field office, but don’t let that get in the way of your fake news.
-
I agree... u cant get more fake than Breitbart, but these criminals only give interviews to white supremacist websites.
-
Breitbart isn’t fake news, you are. You somehow managed to not only misread the HEADLINE of the story YOU posted, but you obviously didn’t read the story or listen to the Erik Prince clip. If you had, you would’ve known it was NYPD whistleblowers disgusted by what went on.
-
I stand corrected. It is NYPD, not NY FBI. However reason why i mixed up was coz I was reading about the very issue here Here's the IG report. pg 199. NY FBI agents were threatening to leak info to force
@Comey to take action. https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download …pic.twitter.com/6uPJOqRpJU
-
I figured that’s why you were conflating the two. Although Baker claims hearsay bias, there’s no actual documentary evidence of any like there is w/ all the anti-Trump texts by agents working both cases. Thanks for admitting you were wrong, that’s rare nowadays especially here.pic.twitter.com/PJbRbHcC7S
-
My allegiance is to the truth. Can you identify ACTIONS that resulted from these anti-trump biases? However anti-hillary "whistleblower" threats forced comey to take action. Both cases arent same. 1 resulted in ACTION (of Comey announcement).
-
Actually the IG said Strzok was “willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.”(Trump probe) IG also said “we did not have confidence” sitting on the Weiner laptop “was free from bias.” That inaction necessitated whistleblower action.pic.twitter.com/07Yh2Gt3aA
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.