Mueller doing a "deeper dive" than Senate Intel on collusion, Manchin says. Feinstein on Mueller vs. SSCI: "They have a level of professionalism..that we don't." Collins on issuing collusion report: "I think that it should NOT be right before the midterms"http://www.snappytv.com/tc/8090474
-
-
CNN
VideoSee more at cnn.comShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe people really don't know how corrupt this committee is.pic.twitter.com/cGZ6odv6he
-
I think the whole Senate Intel Committee is totally compromised and indeed corrupt !Remember when Rubio came to the defense of Warner when text messages emerged that he had contacts w/Russian billionaire without notifying the committee?Something's wrong & fishy in that committee
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Burr: On Trump transition team. $7m from NRA. Just less obvious cover-up than Nunes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There are simply no innocent explanations for the scores of contacts between the Trump campaign & the Russians. Not to mention the lies about the contacts, or the attempt to obstruct Mueller's investigation. Collusion 101. Period.
-
There's explanations for them, you just don't like hearing the truth, you'd rather delude yourself with conspiracy theories. Go on. Your loss in the end.
-
The man is suffering from TDS. It is impossible to have a meaningful conversation with a mentally ill person.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Thanks for the support, SWG.
Let me suggest this, though: don’t waste your time on these fools. Instead, let’s focus on: facts; Mueller’s indictment trail; and voting on Nov 6. -
If you were focused on the facts in the first place you'd understand what a farce this whole thing is. It's easy to paint a narrative when you control the flow of information.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Republicans choose their own facts, per usual, in order to blame Democrats, absolve themselves, or if all else fails muddy the water so average voter is too confused about underlying wrongdoing.
-
No. You're talking about the Democrats!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
we—citizens—absolutely have the right to know before November.
-
We already know. It's just a matter of how long Democrats want to string their base along into thinking there "collusion", whatever that means.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd love to see the same level of scrutiny on the Clinton campaign. All of the allegations against the Trump campaign stem from Clinton collusion with foreign agents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No evidence of collusion- democrat senator Feinstein.
-
She did not say that.
-
Here is a summary (and recording) of an interview she did with Blitzer in May, 2017.https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/19/feinstein_no_evidence_of_russian_collusion_with_trump_campaign_but_there_are_rumors.html …
-
That interview took place prior to any of the congressional hearings, and also prior to any of Mueller’s indictments and guilty pleas. She released the Fusion GPS transcripts for a reason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.