@jckarter bad decision. Whereas the framework client, without the ability to override, has no recourse.
-
-
@concreteniche@jckarter Probably not as flexible. And changing classes to protocols doesn’t make the design/thinking issues go away.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai@concreteniche You can easily wrap a conforming type and patch or completely replace its conformance if you need to.0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
@jckarter@concreteniche Yes, but patching from the outside is limited because you can’t override anything that’s not in the protocol.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
@concreteniche@jckarter Yes, sometimes overriding private methods was (unfortunately) necessary. Already not possible with Swift.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@concreteniche @jckarter That would be nice, but it doesn’t seem realistic to me. At least not on the time scale we need.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Michael Tsai
Patrick Smith
Joe Groff