@jckarter @concreteniche Yes, but patching from the outside is limited because you can’t override anything that’s not in the protocol.
-
-
@mjtsai@concreteniche The client also can't *use* anything that's not in the protocol. The interface goes both ways. - View other replies
-
@jckarter@mjtsai@concreteniche … the developer's implementation would de facto always have the last say on behavior. -
@danielpunkass@jckarter@concreteniche I think in practice protocols would intentionally not have enough surface area. - View other replies
-
@mjtsai@jckarter@concreteniche Sort of depends on how much they are embraced, I think. Stop thinking of them like a Cocoa developer… -
@danielpunkass@jckarter@concreteniche It’s not about embracing because fundamentally protocols are designed to hide details. - View other replies
-
@danielpunkass@jckarter@concreteniche Yes. The interesting thing about Obj-C is that you can call or override them all. - Show more
-
-
-
-
@concreteniche@jckarter Yes, sometimes overriding private methods was (unfortunately) necessary. Already not possible with Swift. -
- View other replies
-
@concreteniche@jckarter That would be nice, but it doesn’t seem realistic to me. At least not on the time scale we need. -
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Patrick Smith
Joe Groff
Michael Tsai
Daniel Jalkut