I’m… not keen on the idea of final by default.
Do not want.
http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/07/17/swift-classes-to-be-non-publicly-subclassable-by-default/ …
I side with @danielpunkass:https://twitter.com/danielpunkass/status/754818323708317696 …
@mbarriault I think it’s a mistake to assume that the decision was based on the discussion.
-
-
@mjtsai I'm just asking to see the other side of the discussion. I don't know why you're so intent on convincing me not to. -
@mbarriault I’m happy for you to read it. Not happy that you are assuming without reading that I was massively skewing the selection. -
@mjtsai I have read it. I'm reading it again, looking for a quote beyond the proposal authors that was actually for it. -
@mjtsai Every quote is either against or can't decide. -
@mjtsai If this was reflective of the full discussion, people would be more in arms about Lattner et al explicitly going against community - View other replies
-
@mbarriault I think people are not up in arms b/c this was long the expected result and impact is limited b/c only affects Swift classes. -
@mjtsai It does seem likely that, by the time Swift frameworks dominate, a Swift-ier solution will have presented itself. - View other replies
-
@mbarriault Maybe the ones designed with the least care, default closed classes all the way, will be those most in need of overriding?
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Casey Liss
Mike Barriault
Michael Tsai