@mjtsai The Time Machine "low priority" thing is interesting. At first blush, I think it affects restore, too? It’s always IMPOSSIBLY slow…
-
-
@mjtsai I always assumed it was a network latency thing, but it appears it was far more about the damned CPU priority. Ugh!0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@danielpunkass Nope, Time Machine has always been much slower for local backups, too.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai@danielpunkass I believe it's intentional, so actions after OS X updates remain responsive. Also affects Spotlight, cache rebuilding0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai@danielpunkass Otherwise Mac OS X becomes *totally* unusable for over an hour after updates are installed. Low priority I/O fixes it0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
@rosyna@mjtsai@danielpunkass Yes, but I do agree it should be tunable for Time Machine - the time differential is O(2^n) or worse.0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
@ameaijou@mjtsai@danielpunkass Indeed. But would that happen naturally when no other I/O is occurring on the system?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@rosyna @ameaijou @danielpunkass That’s the thing—you would think that, but it doesn’t seem to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Daniel Jalkut
Michael Tsai
Rosyna Keller
Gwynne Raskind