@mhenders Yes (like an animal). As they happen. Otherwise it's just skimming, not reconciling, and no way to see what's outstanding.
-
-
@mjtsai Another topic, are you feeling productive with OmniFocus 2?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mhenders Yes. There are some annoyances, but I like it much better than I expected to.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai Coming from Things, I’m still trying to figure out how to see what I “must”, “should” and “might” do.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mhenders Several ways: different contexts, different project types, defer/due dates, flags. Takes a while to come up with a system.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai You should blog about your system. I get far more ideas reading how others have it setup, than through the docs.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mhenders Yes, the best/worst part of OF is that it's so flexible. I use a not-really-GTD system that works for me. It's still evolving.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai For someday/maybe items, do you separate those through context, or project?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mhenders I have several projects of those, in rough priority order. Sequential so only one item is available, and sometimes even deferred.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mjtsai That sounds good. So in the same project, you don’t mix stuff you will do, with stuff you might do (and hidden by context), right?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mhenders Right, I don't mix like that. (I did for a couple years but found that it was more work to micromanage the context assignments.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Michael Tsai
Matt Henderson