So you can't distinguish between talking about something beyond an individual's control he believes is bad for the country and something intended to imply harm. And you don't know your culture.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
President
@realDonaldTrump did not attack RBG or Ginsburg, he replied to THEIR comments showing their bias. Please tell the truth.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In light of 1 & 3, 2 is not appropriate. If Roberts was so concerned about justice, he'd never have allowed Judge Drinky McRapesALot on the court. So... Roberts can GTFOOHWTBS.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What were your thoughts when Obama attacked the Supreme Court during the State of the Union?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4.) Roberts said nothing when Ginsburg and Sotomayor jabbed at him over the past 3 years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whatever. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are fruits of countless crimes and are fundamentally illegitimate. They need to be disgorged.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NARRATOR: Schumer hardly went "too far". What he said was nothing more than a mild rebuke and cautionary note
-
Only Schumer physically accosting Roberts ...
... would be too far.
I laugh only bc the thought of two old guys throwing breath mints at each other was.. well
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.