Michael Harris

I'm looking forward to an actual rebuttal, based on data, as you have direct access to RT's analytics? But maybe you know we are right.

I’d expect a response ina day or two - but as you know data-sharing is not widely done in intl news. A rebuttal should start with false equivalences you draw between a digitally powerful news org and a badly run digital campaign for little Englanders who aren’t on twitter

So you are saying you had more influence and reach? This is also what I am saying.

Did you look at SoV for #remain #leave #Brexit etc? Twitter offered us 5-10% of US election 2016 SoV for $2mln. Given we barely spent on #Brexit I’d say context, sensible comparison incl share of voice might dilute your headline and boost finding quality.

We did do an analysis of total - as you know it is hard to build definite figures for organic v paid. But your organic figures strong, hence our report.

I’d work on the basis that there was very little we paid for. What UK SoV did you loosely ascribe to the RT? Our organic numbers are good because we keep our house clean, believe it or not.

You will see everything when the final report is published. We don't have paid statistics - and can't rely on you telling us not to include paid - so we won't be ascribing SoV.

Because ascribing SoV would undo your hysteria.