Ok. But your entire argument was “I’m right because facts.” But it wasn’t data driven or based on any type of scientific evaluation. Hiding an opinion infused with judgement for others behind a premise of “logical fallacy” or “emotion free analytical analysis” is in bad faith 1/2
-
-
choice. It’s forced on women. Nor is it undergone to alleviate stress imposed by women who are born uncircumcised but identify as circumcised women. I have never heard of an example of this. However, if it does exist and the woman is deemed fit to make said decision by a 2/3
-
medical professional, then the decision is hers. If she regrets is at a later date, then she needs to live w/ that decision like every other. 3/3
-
1) No. 2) You missed my point—all I was saying is that the procedure itself is [technically] mutilation. (Many opponents of circumcision refer to it as mutilation.) It's not a pretty word, but it's not inaccurate either. 3) So it's potentially harmful then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i do hope you feel they same way for males..or even trans females..who are circumcised against their will. and i agree with you. transitioning is not the same as a forced procedure on a healthy patient. trans people have a clear medical indication...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
