Exactly. Imagine light passing through imaginary non inf hemisphere. It's size doesn't change radiant flux.
-
-
Als antwoord op @knarkowicz @BartWronsk en
(Imaginary non inf hemisphere inside the inf hemisphere). Radiant Flux - total emission from light source.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Outgoing flux thru sphere around a pointlight is constant bc irradiance ~ 1/r², but area ~ r²; cancels.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Reedbeta @knarkowicz en
But a sky dome is not a pointlight, doesn't have a 1/r² falloff. Constant *irradiance* no matter size.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
there is no such thing as “falloff”!only visible solid angle. For receiver sky, emissive, lights=same
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Yes there is falloff. For a area light, solid angle falls off with distance. For sky dome, it does not.
2 antwoorden 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
sure,solid angle changes for small emissive surfaces(lights!);but concept of falloff is wrong for area L
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @BartWronsk @Reedbeta en
sooner you kill concept of falloff and quadratic approx in engine/mental model,the less problems you have:)
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @BartWronsk @Reedbeta en
unifies everything: lights,dir lights(solid angle +/- constant),emissive surf,cubes,sky
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
I was trying to make an intuitive argument of why flux is constant under scale in some cases & not others
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
imo, thinking of all this with units really helps: irradiance/illuminance = power over m^2
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.