What "investments" or "new products and services" has Verisign done for .COM and .NET that @ISOC has been unable to do for .ORG?
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I suspect the only serious investment that they'll be interested in is that which further consolidates the market and kills off competition. Perhaps they'll acquire .FOUNDATION from Donuts, or bid for .NONPROFIT?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
PIR has us covered with their daily tweets, a few infographics per year and their yearly awards and gala. All that for just a few million $$$. Thanks PIR! Ethos can force .org registrants to buy hosting and SSL from them or else no domain! How about that?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I think you're engaging in the common mistake of supposing that ISOC directs PIR's spending. What you're obscuring is that ISOC's non-control over PIR's operations was a deliberate design decision for the purpose of keeping ISOC's and PIR's operations separate.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.