Conversation

3/🧵 : TECHNICAL : However, centralized sites like Sudoswap, X2Y2, & Opensea require owners to "Approve" their own contracts to transfer tokens on owners' behalf. Creators can place the contracts of any intermediary on a "denyList" without limiting what owners can do directly.
1
10
4/🧵 : RATIONALE : I believe it is consistent with the ethos of crypto that creators should be given tools to deny intermediaries, or "middlemen," the right to extract profit from trade of their work...
1
11
5/🧵 : .. and artists should exercise their right to cut out intermediaries ESPECIALLY when those intermediaries openly disregard off-chain codes, conventions, or practices which the creator considers to be an essential part of the artwork or their career.
1
11
6/🧵 : ALLOWLIST vs DENYLIST : A few artists/devs ( being one) have arrived at similar solutions, but used allowLists rather than denyLists. The denyList is a better solution because NFT contracts should be permissive of new marketplaces by default.
2
10
7/🧵 : ALLOWLIST vs DENYLIST : With a denyList, a contract that is not maintained (imagine the artist has died) will be operable with new marketplaces. With an allowList, a contract that is not maintained becomes essentially invisible, not interacting with future marketplaces.
1
12
8/🧵: NEXT STEPS: If you care about NFT artist royalties please read the gist linked here for an overview of the proposal and an outline of the next steps. I have submitted a pull request to create a formal EIP. The next step is lobbying by ALL OF US.
Quote Tweet
1/🧵 : ON ROYALTIES : This is a proposed extension to ERC721 which grants NFT creators the ability to deny specific marketplaces or smart contracts the ability to spend tokens on an owner's behalf. gist.github.com/mitchellfchan/
Show this thread
1
12