1a Context exists where there is an answer to a question. If nothing of existence is left out of context then there be no question (and no context) altogether, as you could not have an answer as something separate from a context which is everything.
-
-
Replying to @mistermircea
1b The answer is already part of the question, so in an unlimited context question and answer are one and the same; they could not be otherwise. There is no perception standing apart from it to define anything and separate them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mistermircea
2a The meaning of the question you perceive is indeed the context but only insofar as you can provide a proper answer/response. Context is understood when the answer/response forms a meaningful relationship with the question.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mistermircea
2b If not, the meaning you perceive is not the context. Context is defined not only by your limited individual perception but more crucially by your response. It is the relationship between the two.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mistermircea
2c You cannot have a limited answer to a question which has unlimited context for the simple reason that it does not exist as something separate from it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mistermircea
3a For purposes of communicating (which is to say, acting on) the limited perceptions of our mind, context is always limited in scope and purpose. It is a relationship which we can perceive and act on, and for the most part, it's the most we currently have, but certainly not all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thanks for the great questions. Really enjoyed them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.